les bienveillantes. man, jonathan, that really is fucking great name, it is. littell works as well quiet well. but jonathan. still, i'd rather call notmyboy marcel, but who knows if it ever happens, that i'll have notmyboy, and if it does - if it is me who'll choose his name. but today it hit me /hit me as hard as you can!/ again. this marcel thoughts. interbestnational name.
back to the topic. postmodernism. sure. but, beside of all this awfully disgusting parts, reading of which almost make one vomit, this parts which make one think 'pierdolony naturalizm', plus besides of the story itself /but that's easy, everyone knows that the books like the most are this storyless ones/ - the rest - well, should specify what is exactly the rest: realism, fear, thought, that if mr jonathan made up a story like that - his mind is able to imagine things like these - so he'd probably be able to act like his heroes too - which makes... lost of the thread. keep the thread, keep it!
know. well - the idea is - am used to thought, that if we don't want past to repeat - we should educate kids about it. make them understand what happened, that it was bad and that should not happen again. but - try to reverse it. maybe it's better when people don't know. maybe they won't figure out how to make all this bad stuff solo by themselves again. if my mr jonathan hadn't known anything about the second world war he might not have been able to imagine things like killing somebody by standing on brush /or however they call miotłę/ stick, which lies on somebody's throat. cause, in my opinion, from having this kind of imagination /not to mention all this shiet stories, which all together could make more than one fifth of mill treinta y ocho pages/ is not that far from being able to act itself.
losing the thread again. so pick and choose - got another one, bingo. too much of freud, or maybe to simple freud. now knowing freud too well - felt him in every dreamy sentence. and - what was even more difficult to stand, as did make it through whole 'eichmann in jerusalem' evil-is-trivial-idea - too much about eichmann based on arendt. and don't one fucking dare to say that's not truth. but so well in general did like it honestly and glad to have read it yes.
enough about abstract. little showing off. was on that great party. that /spread my arms around the world/ great! well. did drink, didn't got drunk-killed-stoned-to-death. did have an opportunity to see so many lovely people. did manage to not spoil any moment by bad thoughts. and, this is difficult to say in diplomatic way, not to offend anybody - might have missed some people, sure did, but it was kind of positive missing. let's drink for this, who can't!
more of real life. packed my staff. almost. too much of it. rich in goods /kalka/ which is terrible. on the other hand - poor in goods, as don't have a fucking spoons on my own, which is annoying. maybe the lack of spoons is not the problem in itself, more this kind of feeling, that do depend on good will of my mother, who might be that generous to share her marvellous spoons with me, but - which is also possible - might be that emotional about her spoons, that she won't share her marvellous spoons with her daughter. happyend - finally she did share.
summary. me and torun will always mean the same. the only way to change myself is to change the environment. and... well, the truth is - should finally change and grow up. on the other hand - if growing up means worries, worries na zapas /ach ta etymologiczna rozkmina, dlaczego za-pas, skoro za, to raczej to co bylo, a nie to co będzie: <3/ in advance, fuck, my english certainly in not advanced, but at least worry in advance. always something. but who knows what me-in-different-city-means. somebody will see. the need to say 'hello' entering bus for sure. stomach ache on way there. possibility of shameless cigarettes-begging in the streets /makes me smoke less, makes people able to show they good heart and gives them good karma - win-win situation/.
porachujechuje kości.